In the evolving panorama of financial markets, structured products have emerged as a significant player, especially in the private banking sector. These instruments, often heralded for their ability to furnish tailored risk-return profiles, have seen a surge in popularity among retail and high-net-worth individuals. However, beneath the allure lies a complex mechanism not always fully comprehended by the clientele it serves.
Structured Products Defined:
Structured products are a breed of fixed-term, non-traditional financial instruments intricately crafted to cater to specific risk tolerance and market expectations. The main types generally encountered include:
Principal Protected Notes (PPNs): These aim to safeguard the principal amount while providing an opportunity to participate in the gains from an underlying asset or market index. Please take a look at the illustration below.
Yield Enhancement Products: Designed for higher potential returns in exchange for taking on a defined level of risk. Please take a look at the illustration below.
Market-Linked CDs: These tie the return to the performance of a particular market index while protecting the initial investment. Please take a look at the illustration below.
Structured Investment Vehicles (SIVs): Entities that manage securitised assets and earn spread income. Please take a look at the illustration below.
The Draw of Structured Products:
The attractiveness of structured products largely stems from their narrative of offering higher returns with principal protection or defined risk. Moreover, their customizability gives bankers an easy storyline to entice the naive and the savvy investor.
A Closer Look at The Risks:
However, do clients fully grasp the risks entailed? The following are some of the underlying dangers often understated by bankers:
Credit Risk: The risk that the issuer will default.
Market Risk: The risk of losing money due to the changes in market conditions.
Liquidity Risk: The risk stemming from the inability to sell or buy an instrument at its fundamental value.
Complexity Risk: The risk arising from the complex nature and the interconnectedness of financial instruments.
Fee and Commission Risk: The risk of losing money due to hefty fees and commissions.
A Gaze into the Fee Structure:
Thanks to the embedded fees, structured products are a golden goose for banks. Private banks earn through structuring and distributing these products, while investment banks make money from creating and hedging them. The fee structure is often opaque, making it a lucrative venture for the banks at the client's expense.
A Call for Regulation:
Given their complexity and ease of distribution, a stricter regulatory framework is imperative to ensure the transparent dissemination of structured products.
A Comparative Lens with Bonds:
While structured products may or may not be riskier than bonds, they certainly carry a higher complexity level, making it crucial for the investor to understand the intricacies before diving in.
In conclusion, while structured products offer a bespoke avenue for diversifying portfolios, the veil of complexity surrounding them necessitates greater transparency, understanding, and regulation. The onus is on the financial community to ensure these instruments are demystified and clients have the requisite knowledge to make informed decisions.
Principal Protected Notes
PPNs are financial products designed to safeguard the initial investment while providing an opportunity for positive returns based on the performance of an underlying asset or index. Here’s an illustrative example with an S&P 500 index price of 4000 and an investment value of $100:
Example:
Principal Protection Component: $95 is used to purchase zero-coupon bonds that will mature to $100 over the term of the PPN, ensuring the return of your principal.
Return Component: The remaining $5 is used to purchase call options on the S&P 500, which will provide the potential for positive returns if the S&P 500 increases in value over the term of the PPN.
Fee Structure:
Fees are usually levied at different stages of the investment lifecycle in PPNs, and they may include:
Upfront Fees: The bank may charge a 2% upfront fee, which amounts to $2. This fee would be taken from your initial investment, reducing the funds available for the principal protection and return components.
Management Fees: An annual management fee of 1% on the total investment could be charged, which amounts to $1 per year or $5 over the term of the PPN. This fee could be taken from the return component, reducing the potential gains from the call options.
Performance Fees: If the PPN performs well, there might also be a performance fee. For example, a 10% performance fee on any returns above a specified threshold.
Redemption Fees: If you decide to exit the PPN before maturity, there might be a redemption fee, for instance, 3% of the amount redeemed.
Range of Fees Banks Make:
The total fees that banks make can range significantly depending on the specifics of the PPN. In this example:
Upfront fee: $2
Management fees over five years: $5
Performance fees: Variable, dependent on the performance of the S&P 500.
Redemption fees: Variable, dependent on the timing and amount of redemption.
In summary, with an upfront fee, management fee, and potential performance and redemption fees, the bank could take anywhere from a few dollars to a more significant amount, depending on the performance of the S&P 500 and the specifics of the fee structure. The exact amount would vary from one PPN to another and from one issuing institution to another.
Yield Enhancement Products
YEPs are structured financial products that provide higher returns than traditional fixed-income securities. They usually involve strategies that employ options or other derivative instruments to generate additional yield, often in exchange for taking on a defined level of risk. Here's an illustrative example using the S&P 500 index priced at 4000 and an investment value of $100:
Example:
Investment in Underlying Asset: Initially, $90 out of the $100 investment is used to purchase shares of an S&P 500 index fund.
Options Strategy for Yield Enhancement: The remaining $10 is used to implement an options strategy, such as selling call options against the S&P 500 index to generate premium income.
Fee Structure:
Fees in Yield Enhancement Products can be levied at different stages, and they may include:
Upfront Fees: Assume a 2% upfront fee, which amounts to $2. This fee would be taken from your initial investment, reducing the funds available for buying the index fund and implementing the options strategy.
Management Fees: An annual management fee of 1% on the total investment could be charged, amounting to $1 per year or $5 over the term of the product. This fee could be taken from the income generated by the options strategy.
Performance Fees: If the YEP performs well, there might also be a performance fee. For example, a 10% performance fee on any returns above a specified threshold.
Redemption Fees: If you decide to exit the YEP before maturity, there might be a redemption fee, for instance, 3% of the amount redeemed.
Range of Fees Banks Make:
The total fees that banks make can range significantly depending on the specifics of the YEP. In this example:
Upfront fee: $2
Management fees over five years: $5
Performance fees: Variable, dependent on the performance of the S&P 500.
Redemption fees: Variable, dependent on the timing and amount of redemption.
In summary, banks could make a range of fees from upfront fees, management fees, performance fees, and redemption fees. The exact amount and range would vary based on the specifics of the Yield Enhancement Product, its term, and the performance of the underlying asset or index.
Market-Linked Certificates of Deposit
MLCDs or Equity-Linked CDs are a type of structured product that combines the features of traditional CDs with the potential for increased returns based on the performance of an underlying market index, such as the S&P 500. They offer the safety of principal protection up to a certain amount (usually insured by FDIC up to $250,000) with the potential for higher returns compared to traditional CDs.
Example:
Suppose you invest $100 in a Market-Linked CD with a 5-year term that is linked to the performance of the S&P 500, which is currently priced at 4000.
Principal Protection: Your entire $100 is protected just like in a traditional CD, and you are assured to get back this amount at the end of the term, regardless of the performance of the S&P 500.
Return Component: The return on your MLCD is based on the performance of the S&P 500 over the term. For instance, if the S&P 500 increases by 50% over the 5-year term, your return might be 50% of your investment amount, making your total return $150.
Fee Structure:
Fees in Market-Linked CDs can be embedded within the product structure and may not always be explicitly charged or detailed to the investor. However, they can affect the overall return. Here’s a breakdown of potential fees:
Upfront Fees: Some MLCDs might have upfront fees, say 1% or $1. This fee might be embedded, meaning it's factored into the return calculation.
Management Fees: There might be annual management fees, say 0.5% or $0.50 per year, which could also be embedded within the return structure.
Participation Rate: This is a crucial factor affecting your returns. If the MLCD has a participation rate of 80%, you’ll get 80% of the return of the S&P 500. This is one way the issuing bank makes money: by taking a portion of the returns.
Caps on Returns: Some MLCDs have caps on the returns you can receive, affecting your overall return and acting as a fee.
Early Withdrawal Fees: There might be significant penalties if you withdraw your money before the maturity date.
Range of Fees Banks Make:
The range of fees banks make can vary widely and might be embedded within the product structure, affecting the return, the participation rate, or the cap on returns. In this example:
Upfront and management fees: $1 + $2.50 over 5 years = $3.50
Difference between 100% and the 80% participation rate on a $50 return: $10
If there’s a cap on returns, additional 'fees' could be taken from potential returns.
In summary, the fee structure of MLCDs can be complex. It may significantly affect the potential returns, with the issuing bank making money through various mechanisms, including management fees, participation rates, and return caps.
Structured Investment Vehicles (SIVs) are entities created to manage a portfolio of long-term assets funded by issuing short-term debt. They are not directly linked to a specific stock market index like the S&P 500; instead, they invest in various asset-backed securities, bonds, and other fixed-income instruments. The main objective of SIVs is to earn a spread between the yield on assets and the cost of funding.
However, we can provide a simplified example to illustrate how an SIV could be structured with a hypothetical connection to the S&P 500.
Example:
Suppose an SIV is established with an initial investment of $100. This SIV is set up to invest in a portfolio of assets, including an S&P 500 index fund.
Investment in Assets: The SIV uses the $100 to purchase a mix of assets including $50 in an S&P 500 index fund, and $50 in a variety of other fixed income assets.
Funding Structure: The SIV may also issue short-term debt to raise additional funds for investment, aiming to earn a spread between the yield on its assets and the cost of its debt.
Return Generation: Assume the S&P 500 increases by 10% over a given period, the value of the SIV’s holdings in the S&P 500 index fund would increase to $55.
Fee Structure:
The fees associated with an SIV can include management fees, performance fees, and other costs related to the operation and administration of the vehicle.
Management Fees: Assume a 1% annual management fee on the total assets, which would amount to $1 in the first year.
Performance Fees: A performance fee could be charged, say 10% on the gains, which would amount to $0.50 if the S&P 500 part of the portfolio increases by 10%.
Operational and Administrative Fees: These fees cover the cost of running the SIV and can vary widely depending on the complexity of the vehicle and the underlying investments.
Range of Fees Banks Make:
The range of fees banks or managers could make from an SIV can vary widely depending on the fee structure and the performance of the underlying assets. In this simplified example:
Management fees: $1 per year.
Performance fees: $0.50 on the gains from the S&P 500 portion of the portfolio.
The actual fee structure and amounts would likely be more complex and could include various other fees related to the operation and management of the SIV.
In summary, SIVs are complex structures with various fee components that could significantly impact the net return to investors. The example provided is highly simplified and does not reflect the typical operation of an SIV, which usually involves a more complex mix of assets and liabilities, and a more intricate fee structure.
1648 | Consulting & Beyond
We help transform and future-proof financial firms. 1648 is at the forefront of today's rapidly evolving financial landscape, guiding wealth managers and fintech firms through discovery and transformational journeys. Our expertise ensures that these firms adapt to industry transformation and drive it forward by employing the most effective strategies and digital innovations. The future of wealth management becomes more transparent, intelligent, and resilient with 1648.
The strategies presented are thematic and do not constitute investment advice (or advice of any kind). No assurance can be given that the objectives of the aforementioned investment strategies will be achieved; the strategies involve risk (including, without limitation, illiquidity risk) and may incur a loss on some or all capital deployed. The opinions expressed, or indeed the information or assumptions that underpin them, may contain errors, mistakes, or omissions; no assurance or warranty can be made as to the accuracy or completeness of this information, and readers should not place any reliance on this content for the purposes of executing investment decisions or for any other purpose. Readers accept full responsibility for using this content and are kindly requested to consult with their professional advisor before making any investment decision related to the same.
Comments